I
don’t know whether anyone have used this term before I coin; but I am sure that
there is a dilemma for every researchers, but the point of occurrence
varies. Before move further I should define
what researcher dilemma. Many of us are familiar with prisoner’s dilemma,
personnel dilemma and incumbent dilemma. The Researcher dilemma is the
situation where researcher’s idea contradicts with the manifold opinions of
experts. It is not a tussle between multiple options or a predicament to choose
the best, but it’s an impasse. Rather than his likes, he may force to satisfy
the populace. Here the dilemma starts. The idea may crush and chew among the
dossiers and these discussions end with new dimensions. Here a researcher
creeps by the interest of his guide, faculty members and the audience.
Ultimately the victims of Researchers dilemma last with a disaster. The
researcher fails to satisfy his global listeners and he loses in his own
mission. When the researcher comes out with a problem, he may perturb with
multitude of value additions by various trespassers. Problem definition,
methodology, inference development and even in conclusions the dominance of
‘the other’ creates researchers dilemma.
Is
there any way out for this laborious dilemma? Stick on our own conclusions
rather than go for the trend, other or popular. But only a real researcher can
validate his problem. Unless and until he becomes competent in this aspect,
this dilemma will dominate the researchers mind. It is vital to consider the
opinions of experts, but the conclusion should from the researcher side. Never
be panic or anxious about the result, obviously it’s a trial and error and a
complete document is not a research. The gap and scope it leaves for research
or the researchability of the outcome decides the worth of a research. Instead
of solving problems it will create any menace to the research community. Valid,
reliable and viable problem and modus operandi determines the quality of
research. Here the mind, thinking and discussions make the researcher
competent. It is effective discussions with experts give reflections and these
reflections produce concrete conclusions. This is what a real researcher should
take care of.
Paul
V Mathew