After a sudden silence, different individuals and parties depleted it with few comments. It was welcomed by the whole Hindu community but had a mixed response from Muslim people. BJP veteran L K Advani said the Allahabad High Court verdict in the Ayodhya title suit was "faith upheld by law" and that it has paved the way for reconciliation with judicial ratification. But other commend says like - We expected the verdict in our favour. It is tilted towards one party which is not fair," its lawyer Zafaryab Jilani told IANS. "We will go for appeal. There is no second thought. We are studying the judgment."
Really it has mixed response and what you think in this scene. The maturity of Indian people to receive the verdict must appreciate. Whether faith or justice? which is most important.??????
I think, in democratic, pluralistic and diverse - obviously cradle of democracy not expecting such an opinion - 'faith upheld by law' and I commending it as crime against law and constitution. It is not acceptable to put faith above law or constitution that may lead to controversies. Court agreed that Ram was born in Ayodhya and there was a temple in Ayodhya that was destructed by Mugal King Babar and built a Masjid in that place. So now its under the control of Muslim legally but by faith it can substantiate to Hindus.
While accepting this fact Karunanidhi commends that - We have identified the birth place of Ram and birth place of Raja Raja Cholan is still not recognized, that was just before 1000 years. But the duty bestowed up on the court was very crucial - a crucial dilemma, court wants to upheld justice and Government wants a peaceful response. With some hours of confusions and doubts, it was declared to split in to three.
Now the question is weather it is justifiable or not? and what the outcome expected from supreme court.
Let's wish for a right conclusion and peaceful country which upheld our religious integrity.
No comments:
Post a Comment